In order to obtain valid results, it is critical to create real psychological environment. The members of the control group had to find the two equal graphic lines drawn on the two different cards. The experiment has shown that people in the experiment gave correct answers, but later changed them to the wrong ones to stay unanimous with the rest of the group.
Get Full Essay Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues. Participants were divided into two groups, some acting as prisoners and others acting as guards in a prison set-up. The participants were contained in the prison and in their roles for a projected period of two weeks.
It was observed however that after a matter of days internalization of assigned roles had begun to affect the interaction of participants in the experiment. Although participant playing at being the guards were instructed not to harm the prisoners physically, inventive new methods of shame and torture were imposed on the latter.
The situation was so stressful that five of the participants designated as prisoners had to be sent home on the fifth running day of the experiment Zimbardo, Of interest is the fact that all the participants had been ensured to be healthy both physically and psychologically upon their entrance into the experiment Zimbardo, On the sixth running day or on the evening of the fifth day to be exact, the experiment was discontinue by Zimbardo because of its adverse effects on the participants and the rapid escalation of deviant behavior observed.
Deviance has been said not to be a quality of an act a person commits, but rather the consequence of the application by others of rules and sanctions given to an offender Grills, Calhoun and Conyers define deviance as acts which are norm-violating.
It is thus the characteristics of acts that go against established norms which incur sanctions and requires the imposition of rules to protect the self-same norms. It is thus further posited that the difference in norms in given groups and situations gives rise to differing standards in labeling acts as deviant.
In the study in question there has been concern whether or not the acts performed by the students posing as guards could be termed deviant behavior. There have been many studies and actual occurrences in real life which suggest that the power abuse observed in the Stanford experiment was not entirely an isolated event.
In fact, it has been observed in repeated incidents occurring in several different circumstances. Given the nature of deviance as discussed earlier, it should be kept in mind that in prison sites there are established rules regarding the manner of interaction between prisoners and guards.
Included in the rules are provisions for guards not to abuse prisoners. It should also be kept in mind that guards are stationed in jails mainly to ensure that prisoners do not escape or that they harm one another or themselves during their stay in prison. This is thus the basis of power held by guards in prison settings.
It can thus be seen that it is not in accordance with the normal prescribed functions of guards to humiliate, shame, or degrade prisoners over whom they have charge. The concurrence from other prison settings does not validate the acts of the guards in the Zimbardo prison experiment.
The behavior they manifested may still be deemed deviant as may other abusive behaviors observed in other prison situations as all these behaviors warrant sanctions and are provided against in the rules given to guards.
It is observed that the basic reason why the participants in the Zimbardo experiment acted so was because of the lack of supervision on the effects of their actions Zimbardo, Zimbardo himself acted as warden in the experiment and was presumably also affected by the role-play employed.A Study in Stanford.
Search this site.
Preamble. A Positive Variation: The Experiment () Applicative Science: The Case of Abu Ghraib. Philip Zimbardo: The Man behind the Laboratory. Questions to Consider. Reaction. References. The Experiment. Thirty years later, Stanford Prison Experiment.
Brock Turner, a former Stanford University swimmer convicted of sexually assaulting an unconscious woman outside a fraternity house, has been released from prison after serving half a six-month. What were the ethical concerns involved in the Stanford Prison Experiment, Asch’s Conformity Experiment, and Milgram’s Shock-Obedience Experiment?
Whatever level of paper you need – college, university, research paper, term paper or just a high school paper, you can safely place an order.
Last Completed Projects #. Ethical Review - The Stanford Prison ExperimentCOLLAPSE The Stanford Prison Experiment is a classic case study used in many introductory psychology courses (Bartels, ).
The controversial nature of the study and the dramatic results have lead many people to . The experiment was the right thing to do, the wrong thing was to let it go past the second day Prof Zimbardo, Psychologist who led the Stanford prison experiment In the end it was a fellow. Case Study/Reaction Paper | The Stanford Prison Experiment | Reviewing and Analyzing: The Stanford Prison Experiment The Stanford Prison Experiment was conducted at Stanford University in California from August 14 to August 20,